Astronomy is the most essential element of the creation of religion. Archaeological evidence of many ancient cultures demonstrates that celestial bodies were the subject of worship during the Stone and Bronze Ages. Amulets and stone walls in northern Europe depict arrangements of stars in constellations that match their historical positions, particularly circumpolar constellations. These date back as early as 30,000–40,000 years ago. Although this is not the oldest evidence of the origins of religion. The earliest evidence of religious thought is based on the ritual treatment of the dead. Most animals display only a casual interest in the dead of their own species. Ritual burial thus represents a significant advancement in human behavior. Ritual burials represent an awareness of life and death and a possible belief in the afterlife. Paleolithic burials date back as early as 100,000 years ago. History about the origins of religion could go on and on. Since I am inclined to an evolutionist view, in my opinion, Religion is the deepest part of man's emotional structure. It is the test of man's passion for his existence and it is also subject to evolution. During the course of man's brain development, the expansion of this growth not only lies within but is shown in traditions, practices, beliefs and culture which mainly led to various transformation of systems may it be political or religious. The same thing with God. When man can no longer find coherent answer to his queries he turns into a presence higher than his own, a force, similar to science with its physical laws. God is the deduced product of logical and analytical thinking at the limits. It is the cognitive dissonance of most people to conclude anything unexplainable a result of mystics concerning God. It is the test of man's ability to evaluate and explore, the test of intelligence and when combined, God and religion, it is the assessment of your spirituality, your entire being the humanness.
Earlier this December, I went down to search for a book I needed to accomplish a small project of mine, creating my own Dobsonian telescope. I have been recently engrossed with night photography that I got the enthusiasm to build my own telescope. An alarming rate of published atheist books actually struck me. Written by the famous Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and many others. Although I do not have anything against the idea of atheism, the apprehension of such is how people, particularly students recognize the points given through explicit statements that have the tendency to affect them psychologically and emotionally. Actually, reading a thread on facebook regarding the non-existence of God is so inculcating, individuals may actually acknowledge. What's even more surprising is the sudden appearance of militant atheists and when I say militant, they shame your beliefs and substitute their own. They attack you with their numerous unpleasant scenarios and how God has not made his presence felt during those times. Certain delicate subjects that a believer would find insulting, simply because insulting one's belief, religion and God is like wounding his entire being, his humanness. This is mainly the reason why I never argue about religion, spirituality and God because at the end of everything, usual result is the non-popular idea always being ostracized. The customary dispute is what science has not proven, does not exist. But Science is nothing more or less than a method of inquiry based on hypothesis testing facilitated by data collection. It is distinct from, though intimately connected to logic and rationality. Notably, the concept of falsifiability is key to this tradition, hypotheses must be stated in such a way that they can be dis-proven with but one antagonistic observation. Science doesn't prove a thing, but that doesn't mean science is useless. What science does is pare away less plausible explanations for any given phenomenon, thereby hopefully leading us closer and closer to the truth about the phenomenon. And yes, Science has not proven the existence of God but it has not dis-proven his existence as well. I know I've claimed that I follow an evolutionist view and Richard Dakwins is an evolutionary biologist but I do not conclude that there is no higher force governing the universe. Every time I look up at the sky and see these sparkling lights above me while I'm trying to capture them nicely, I can't help but think there must be something that made everything I see. I cannot allow that we came from nothing. The beauty this world presents us is inconceivable that I'd like to believe in Spinoza's God.

As a closing remark, arguments about religion, faith, and God is letting ideas free and allowing it evolve into a different breed that could freely swim in the depths of all unanswered questions but still they will remain unanswered...
2 comments:
A remarkable read. Thank you so much for sharing !
Post a Comment